|
PollyBio: Predicting Elections From Candidates' Biographies
|
Scott Armstrong and Andreas Graefe developed a model to predict the winner of U.S. Presidential Elections based on candidates’ biographies. Their model, named PollyBio, uses 60 biographical cues that are expected to have an impact on the chances of a candidate on being elected. For example, a candidate receives positive scores if he descends from a political family, is first-born, single child, lost a parent in childhood, is married but not divorced, has children, graduated from a prestigious college, held political offices, has authored a book, has military experience, and is tall and good-looking. Then, the candidate who achieves the higher overall score is predicted as the election winner. Armstrong and Graefe tested their model for the 29 U.S. Presidential Elections from 1896 to 2008. The model failed only two times. For the remaining 27 elections, the model correctly predicted the winner. This record of 93% correct predictions compares favorably to other statistical models as well as to polls and prediction markets. The forecasts can be made as soon as the candidates are known; they can be issued even before, conditional on who is expected to be in the race. Thus, the model can help the Republican Party to decide who they should nominate to run against President Obama in 2012. Evaluations of potential Republican candidates will be posted here in due course. Armstrong, J. S. & A. Graefe: Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates, MPRA working paper, Presented at the Symposium on Leadership and Individual Differences, Lausanne, November 2009.
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Friday, 08 January 2010 06:22 |
|
As of January 2010, Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota, ranks second at the intrade.com prediction market to be the Republican nominee for the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. The market sees his chances to win the nomination at about 18%. According to the preliminary forecast of the biographical model, Pawlenty would not be a good choice for the Republicans. While Obama would achieve a score of 22, Pawlenty's score is 18. This translates to a predicted two-party share of the popular vote of 53.6% for Obama, or 46.4% for Pawlenty. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Tuesday, 05 January 2010 16:34 |
|
As of January 2010, Mitt Romney is favored by the intrade.com prediction market to be the Republican nominee for the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. The market sees his chances to win the nomination at about 25%, followed by Tim Pawlenty (20%), Sarah Palin (18%), and John Thune (13%). According to the biographical model, the chances for Romney - for whom running in 2012 is "always a possibility" - to defeat Obama are not great. While Obama would achieve a score of 23, Romney's score is 21. This translates to a predicted two-party share of the popular vote of 51.7% for Obama, or 48.3% for Romney. Although Romney scored higher than Palin and Huckabee, he would need to achieve higher ratings than Obama on the four variables for which no data are yet available (i.e., facial competence, intelligence, attractiveness, and voice) in order to be predicted as the winner. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Sunday, 03 January 2010 07:49 |
According to a USA TODAY / Gallup poll, conducted Oct. 31 to Nov. 1, former Republican Governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee seemed to be a promising candidate for the Republican party in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Among all respondents, 40% said they would "seriously consider supporting" Huckabee for president. Among Republicans, 71% would support him. No other potential Republican contender achieved an equally high voter support. However, the PollyBio model, which is based on biographical information about candidates, gives Huckabee little chance to defeat Obama. While Obama would achieve a score of 23, Huckabee's score is 20. This translates to a predicted two-party share of the popular vote of 52.5% for Obama, or 47.5 for Huckabee. According to the PollyBio model, Huckabee would have to be rated more favorable than Obama for each of the four variables for which no data are yet available (i.e. facial competence, intelligence, attractiveness, and voice). |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 12:48 |
|
Here are the new scores after the model update for Barack Obama and Sarah Palin. While Obama achieves a score of 25, Palin’s score is 16. This translates to a predicted two-party vote share of 57.7% for Obama, with a 95% prediction interval of +/- 6.7%. If one removes predictor variables that might favor males in inter-gender races (such as the candidates’ height and weight), Obama would still be predicted to receive 56.3% of the vote. Even if Palin would be perceived as more competent, intelligent, and attractive than Obama – three cues for which no data are yet available – the model gives her little chance of defeating the incumbent president. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Monday, 16 November 2009 15:06 |
|
The PollyBio model has been updated and refined. The update included adding the 1896 election to the sample as well as incorporating new variables. In the latest version, the model uses 62 variables to predict the winner of the popular vote in U.S. Presidential Elections. Out of the last 29 elections from 1896 to 2008, the model correctly predicted the election winner 27 times. |
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Wednesday, 30 September 2009 09:49 |
|
Bad news for Sarah Palin: PollyBio predicts that she would not be able to defeat President Obama in a potential 2012 showdown. Based on her bio-demographic data, Sarah Palin does not seem to be a good choice for the Republican Party. While Obama achieves a score of 20, Palin’s score is 11 points. Given the model’s historical performance, this translates to a predicted two-party voteshare of 59.5% for Obama, with a 95% prediction interval of +/- 6.2%. Even if Palin would be perceived as more competent, intelligent, and attractive than Obama – three cues for which no data is yet available – the model gives her little chance of defeating the incumbent president. This suggests that the Republican Party further extends its search. The PollyBio model can help with that. Evaluations of other potential Republican candidates will be posted here in due course. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Written by Andreas Graefe
|
|
Friday, 18 September 2009 17:16 |
|
The Economic Logic Blog reports on the PollyBio election forecasting model, which can help parties to identify who they should nominate to run for office. Click here for the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|